Score away–home after each goal; season totals in parentheses.
Shot quality
Expected goals (xG) rate every unblocked shot by how often shots like it go in, from where it was taken,
the shot type, the strength and what happened just before it. How it works
UTA 41%Deserve to win59% WPG
UTA
WPG
2.89
Expected goals
3.44
3
Goals (no shootout)
2
2.08
Expected goals, 5 on 5
2.20
63
Shot attempts
61
50
Unblocked attempts
46
32
Shots on goal
30
Game notes
What stood out as the game went on, from the play-by-play and the shifts. Time on the bench is
counted in 5-on-5 play outside the penalty box; the note says the player sat, not why. Goals saved are against the
shots' expected goals (xG).
2nd Period
9:57
UTA
Deserve to win
Deserve to win · UTA takes the lead, 61–39%
WPG had led since 0:59 of the 1st, by as much as 65%
11:10
UTA
xG swing
xG swing · Out-chanced WPG 1.30–0.18
In xG over 10 minutes, 1:10 to 11:10 of the 2nd; goals 2–0
17:23
WPG
Deserve to win
Deserve to win · WPG takes the lead, 61–39%
UTA had led since 9:57 of the 2nd, by as much as 66%
xG comes from hockeystats.io's own model, a gradient-boosted tree model trained on every unblocked shot
from the 2021-22 to 2025-26 regular seasons using the NHL's public play-by-play. Each shot's value is the
share of similar shots that became goals. A team's xG is the sum over its shots; "deserve to win" asks how
often the team would outscore its opponent if every shot went in at exactly that rate. Blocked shots count
as attempts but have no xG (the NHL records where they were blocked, not where they were taken), so the map
leaves them out.
An expected-goals take on Dom Luszczyszyn's Game Score: goals and assists, the quality of a
player's own shots, shot quality for and against while they were on the ice at 5v5, penalties, faceoffs and puck plays,
all in goals; goalies by goals saved above expected. From the NHL play-by-play and shift charts.
