Central Division, Western Conference
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | 33 | 31 | 12 | 78 | 215 | 232 | -17 | 51.3% |
|
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Apr 07, 2026
| Opponent | Probability | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
|
|
1.2% |
Probabilities sum to 1.2% (= playoff probability). Remaining 98.8% = miss playoffs.
The Winnipeg Jets are on the brink, sitting at 76 points with just a 4.1% chance of reaching the playoffs after a sharp 6.9% drop. With seven games left and a projected finish of 83.7 points, they’re tracking well below the expected Western Conference cutoff of 87.9. At this stage, Winnipeg likely needs close to a perfect run to have any realistic shot.
At 32-31-12 through 75 games, Winnipeg’s 50.7% points percentage reflects a team that has hovered around .500 all season, reinforced by a -18 goal differential (213 scored, 231 allowed). Their underlying team strength rating of 50.2% paints them as essentially league average, stronger at home (54.7%) than on the road (46.9%). The recent 60.0% form offers some encouragement, suggesting they’ve been playing better of late, but the margin for error created by months of inconsistency is now razor thin.
The Jets are 12th in the conference and five points back of Nashville, who currently hold the final playoff spot at 79 points, with San Jose and Los Angeles also sitting at 79. Even if Winnipeg jumps those three clubs, they would still need help to catch teams like Vegas and Utah at 84 points, let alone Edmonton and Anaheim at 87. With Nashville projected for 86.9 points and San Jose for 87.9, the math requires multiple teams to underperform simultaneously while Winnipeg surges, which explains the slim 4.1% odds.
Winnipeg has seven games remaining, three at home and four on the road, with an average-strength slate (51.1% opponent strength compared to a 52.9% league average). The model expects 7.7 more points, which would leave them short of the projected cutoff. To reach 88 points — a likely safe number — they’d need to collect 12 of a possible 14 points, essentially going 6-1-0 or better. Given their road-heavy finish and middling away performance, that’s a tall order.
The Jets’ path is clear but narrow: string together a near-flawless final stretch and hope the teams above them stumble. While their recent play shows life, their overall body of work and the crowded race ahead leave almost no margin for error. Winnipeg isn’t mathematically out of it, but realistically, their playoff hopes are hanging by a thread.
Your team's playoff hopes are fading — here are some teams worth cheering for:
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | 22 | 6 | 104 | +47 | 63.9% | 100.0% | 9.3% |
If you love structure and speed, Carolina is an easy bandwagon. The Hurricanes roll four lines, pressure relentlessly, and feel a lot like the Jets at their best—just with a bit more finish right now. It’s a smart, deep team that’s built for a long run.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 22 | 6 | 102 | +66 | 67.8% | 100.0% | 11.0% |
Tampa Bay gives you star power and big-game pedigree. Watching Nikita Kucherov and Brayden Point operate in the playoffs is pure entertainment, and Andrei Vasilevskiy can still steal a series. If you want a proven contender that knows how to flip the switch, this is it.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | 23 | 8 | 100 | +35 | 60.0% | 100.0% | 5.6% |
Buffalo is the fun, up-and-coming East team with serious firepower. Their young core plays fast and attacks in waves, which should appeal to Jets fans who appreciate skill up front. There’s also something satisfying about backing a long-suffering market chasing a breakthrough.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | 29 | 9 | 87 | +8 | 56.7% | 98.4% | 5.5% |
If you’re staying in the West but avoiding the Central, Edmonton offers the superstar experience. Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl can turn any game into must-watch TV, and a deep run would be all about offensive fireworks. It’s a low-effort, high-entertainment bandwagon.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 | 26 | 16 | 86 | +7 | 52.5% | 96.2% | 3.8% |
Vegas is always in the mix and built for playoff hockey—big, structured, and opportunistic. They don’t overwhelm with flash, but they’re relentless and hard to put away. If you want a team that feels sturdy and battle-tested without Central Division baggage, the Knights fit nicely.
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Understanding the factors that drive the 1.2% playoff probability
Playoff probabilities are calculated through Monte Carlo simulation, running 10,000+ scenarios of the remaining season. Each game is simulated based on team strength ratings, home ice advantage (~55% win rate), and opponent matchups.
Projected to finish with 82–85 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 88–90 points. Finishes above the cutline in 1.5% of simulations.
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 87 | 77 | 5 | 56.7% | 70.0% | 50.5% | 92.8 | 98.4% | |
| 5 | 87 | 77 | 5 | 50.6% | 50.0% | 48.3% | 92.8 | 96.8% | |
| 6 | 86 | 76 | 6 | 57.2% | 60.0% | 53.6% | 93.1 | 98.3% | |
| 7 | 86 | 77 | 5 | 52.5% | 50.0% | 47.1% | 92.0 | 96.2% | |
| 8 | 81 | 76 | 6 | 52.7% | 70.0% | 52.4% | 87.9 | 44.2% | |
| 9 | 81 | 76 | 6 | 50.1% | 60.0% | 43.3% | 88.1 | 36.8% | |
| 10 | 79 | 75 | 7 | 46.2% | 45.0% | 46.1% | 86.7 | 22.3% | |
| 11 | 78 | 76 | 6 | 50.7% | 70.0% | 55.9% | 84.7 | 5.7% | |
| 12 | 78 | 76 | 6 | 50.5% | 60.0% | 52.6% | 83.5 | 1.2% | |
| Game | Impact | |
|---|---|---|
| LIVE WPG vs SEA | WPG playing |
WPG win:
+2.7%
SEA win:
-3.6%
|
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 54.4% | 47.9% | 46.2% | 60.0% |
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | Mark Scheifele | C | 76 | 34 | 60 | 94 | +4 | 0 | 32 | 42 | 21:34 | |
| 81 | Kyle Connor | L | 76 | 36 | 51 | 87 | +3 | 0 | 31 | 16 | 21:35 | |
| 13 | Gabriel Vilardi | C | 76 | 28 | 34 | 62 | -6 | 0 | 19 | 35 | 18:51 | |
| 44 | Josh Morrissey | D | 71 | 13 | 39 | 52 | +12 | 0 | 32 | 109 | 24:47 | |
| 91 | Cole Perfetti | C | 62 | 12 | 19 | 31 | -3 | 0 | 51 | 30 | 15:39 | |
| 9 | Alex Iafallo | L | 76 | 12 | 15 | 27 | +3 | 0 | 117 | 52 | 15:28 | |
| 19 | Jonathan Toews | C | 76 | 9 | 16 | 25 | -15 | 0 | 16 | 31 | 14:27 | |
| 36 | Morgan Barron | C | 65 | 11 | 12 | 23 | +5 | 0 | 132 | 40 | 12:48 | |
| 64 | Logan Stanley → BUF | D | 59 | 9 | 12 | 21 | -2 | 0 | 96 | 69 | 17:12 | |
| 17 | Adam Lowry | C | 64 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -1 | 0 | 139 | 42 | 14:55 | |
| 62 | Nino Niederreiter | R | 55 | 8 | 11 | 19 | -4 | 0 | 66 | 20 | 13:54 | |
| 2 | Dylan DeMelo | D | 76 | 3 | 15 | 18 | +13 | 0 | 106 | 104 | 21:29 | |
| 45 | Cole Koepke | L | 60 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 170 | 12 | 10:13 | |
| 54 | Dylan Samberg | D | 60 | 1 | 13 | 14 | +7 | 0 | 48 | 110 | 21:48 | |
| 7 | Vladislav Namestnikov | C | 57 | 7 | 6 | 13 | -11 | 0 | 71 | 36 | 13:51 | |
| 70 | Tanner Pearson → BUF | L | 52 | 7 | 6 | 13 | +7 | 0 | 68 | 26 | 10:53 | |
| 14 | Gustav Nyquist | R | 51 | 1 | 11 | 12 | -8 | 0 | 28 | 19 | 12:40 | |
| 4 | Neal Pionk | D | 48 | 3 | 8 | 11 | +3 | 0 | 103 | 72 | 22:44 | |
| 5 | Luke Schenn → BUF | D | 46 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -11 | 0 | 139 | 54 | 13:44 | |
| 57 | Elias Salomonsson | D | 28 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -2 | 0 | 45 | 21 | 18:25 | |
| 93 | Brad Lambert | C | 15 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 10:42 | |
| 27 | Isak Rosen ← BUF | R | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 10:22 | |
| 24 | Haydn Fleury | D | 33 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -15 | 0 | 49 | 50 | 13:51 | |
| 78 | Jacob Bryson ← BUF | D | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 12:02 | |
| 53 | Danil Zhilkin | C | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 7:35 | |
| 6 | Colin Miller | D | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -8 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 13:45 | |
| 34 | Ville Heinola | D | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 13:14 | |
| 25 | Parker Ford | C | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 9:33 | |
| 3 | Isaak Phillips | D | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9:31 | |
| 71 | Walker Duehr | R | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 9:30 |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 04 | @ CBJ | 1 - 2 | W |
| Apr 02 | @ DAL | 3 - 0 | L |
| Mar 31 | @ CHI | 3 - 4 | W (OT/SO) |
| Mar 28 | @ COL | 2 - 4 | W |
| Mar 26 | vs COL | 2 - 3 | L |
| Mar 24 | vs VGK | 4 - 1 | W |
| Mar 22 | @ NYR | 2 - 3 | W (OT/SO) |
| Mar 21 | @ PIT | 5 - 4 | L (OT/SO) |
| Mar 19 | @ BOS | 6 - 1 | L |
| Mar 17 | vs NSH | 3 - 4 | L (OT/SO) |
| Date | Opponent | Location | Opp Strength | Exp Pts | Playoff Swing | Predicted Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 09, 20:00 | @ St. Louis Blues | Away | 50.7% | 1.04 | 2.2% | STL (55%) |
| Apr 11, 19:00 | vs Philadelphia Flyers | Home | 56.2% | 1.10 | 1.9% | PHI (52%) |
| Apr 13, 22:00 | @ Vegas Golden Knights | Away | 52.5% | 1.07 | - | VGK (53%) |
| Apr 14, 21:00 | @ Utah Mammoth | Away | 57.2% | 1.03 | - | UTA (56%) |
| Apr 16, 20:00 | vs San Jose Sharks | Home | 46.2% | 1.25 | - | WPG (57%) |
| Averages (Next 5 games): | 5.5 pts | 2.1% | ||||
Expected points are calculated based on win probabilities: (2 × win%) + (0.25 × loss%) for overtime losses. Opponent strength ratings help identify which games are easier or harder opportunities to earn points.