Edmonton Oilers
Pacific Division, Western Conference
Current Standings
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | 39 | 29 | 9 | 87 | 265 | 257 | +8 | 56.5% |
|
Playoff Probabilities
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Apr 07, 2026
Likely First-Round Opponents
| Opponent | Probability | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
Utah Mammoth
|
41.8% | |
Vegas Golden Knights
|
25.2% | |
Anaheim Ducks
|
18.3% | |
Los Angeles Kings
|
4.2% | |
Colorado Avalanche
|
3.3% | |
San Jose Sharks
|
2.7% | |
Nashville Predators
|
2.7% |
Probabilities sum to 98.4% (= playoff probability). Remaining 1.6% = miss playoffs.
Analysis
Summary
The Edmonton Oilers are effectively playoff-bound, sitting at a 99.1% postseason probability despite a slight dip of 0.2%. With a projected 93.4 points and the playoff cutoff estimated at 86.2, Edmonton would need a near-collapse to miss. The more realistic question now is seeding, where their division and conference title odds sit at 19.7% and 12.5%, respectively.
Record and Recent Performance
At 38-28-9 through 75 games, the Oilers have banked 85 points with a 56.7% points percentage and a modest +10 goal differential (261 goals for, 251 against). Their underlying team strength rating of 56.0% suggests they’re slightly better than their record indicates, especially at home where they post a 58.7% strength compared to 51.9% on the road. Most encouraging is their recent 65.0% form, a clear uptick that has stabilized their playoff position after some midseason volatility. In short, Edmonton is playing like a mid-tier playoff team trending upward at the right time.
The Competition
Anaheim holds fourth with 87 points and a projected 96.8-point finish, making them the most likely team Edmonton would need to catch for home-ice positioning; gaining that ground will require a strong finish and likely some help. Utah and Vegas are both at 82 points, with projections of 91.6 and 90.3 respectively, meaning they’re within striking distance of Edmonton’s current slot but still chasing. Below the cutline, Nashville (77 points), Winnipeg (76), Los Angeles (76), Seattle (75), and San Jose (75) would need a surge combined with an Edmonton collapse to change the picture. Given the Oilers’ cushion and projection, the real battle is about avoiding a slide into a lower wild-card position rather than simply qualifying.
Remaining Schedule
Edmonton has seven games left, four at home and three on the road, with an opponent strength of 48.2%, well below the 53.0% league average. That relatively soft slate contributes to an expected 8.4 remaining points, which would push them comfortably past the projected 86.2-point cutoff. A home-heavy finish plays into their stronger splits, and even average execution should be enough to secure their spot. If they outperform expectation by even a point or two, they could realistically pressure Anaheim for fourth.
Outlook
Barring an unlikely collapse, the Oilers will be in the playoffs, with seeding still meaningfully in play. Their strong recent form and favorable schedule give them a chance to finish closer to the mid-90s in points and potentially climb a spot. Edmonton enters April not fighting for survival, but positioning — and that’s a good place to be.
Bandwagon Case
Why you should jump on the bandwagon:
If you’re hopping on a playoff bandwagon, you could do a lot worse than Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl at full throttle. Edmonton still runs through the most dangerous one-two punch in hockey — McDavid’s speed and vision warp defensive coverage every shift, and Draisaitl remains one of the league’s best finishers and power-play quarterbacks from the half wall. Add in Evan Bouchard’s booming shot and puck-moving confidence on the blue line, plus Zach Hyman living at the top of the crease, and this is a team that can score in waves.
There’s also a sense of urgency here. The Oilers have been knocking on the door for a few years now, and with this core squarely in its prime, every postseason feels like a real opportunity rather than a learning experience. Their recent form has ticked up at the right time, and when Edmonton is rolling, the power play can flip a series in a matter of games. The goaltending and defensive structure can wobble, but that volatility is part of the intrigue — they don’t just win quietly, they overwhelm you.
At their best, the Oilers play fast, aggressive, and a little bit on the edge. They’ll trade chances because they trust their stars to finish more than you can. In a playoff field where margins are thin, having the two most dynamic offensive players in any series is a pretty compelling reason to tune in — and maybe stick around.
Required Win Percentage for Playoffs
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Playoff Probability Breakdown
Understanding the factors that drive the 98.4% playoff probability
📊 Schedule Context
🎯 Key Factors
🏒 Playoff Picture
Playoff probabilities are calculated through Monte Carlo simulation, running 10,000+ scenarios of the remaining season. Each game is simulated based on team strength ratings, home ice advantage (~55% win rate), and opponent matchups.
Points Distribution vs. Cutline
Projected to finish with 91–94 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 88–90 points. Finishes above the cutline in 98.6% of simulations.
Team Projection
Playoff Cutline
Playoff Race — Western Conference
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 87 | 77 | 5 | 56.7% | 70.0% | 50.5% | 92.8 | 98.4% | |
| 5 | 87 | 77 | 5 | 50.6% | 50.0% | 48.3% | 92.8 | 96.7% | |
| 6 | 86 | 76 | 6 | 57.2% | 60.0% | 53.6% | 93.1 | 98.3% | |
| 7 | 86 | 77 | 5 | 52.5% | 50.0% | 47.1% | 92.0 | 96.2% | |
| 8 | 81 | 76 | 6 | 52.7% | 70.0% | 52.4% | 87.9 | 44.3% | |
| 9 | 81 | 76 | 6 | 50.1% | 60.0% | 43.3% | 88.1 | 36.7% | |
| 10 | 79 | 75 | 7 | 46.2% | 45.0% | 46.1% | 86.7 | 22.6% | |
| 11 | 78 | 76 | 6 | 50.7% | 70.0% | 55.9% | 84.7 | 5.6% | |
| 12 | 78 | 76 | 6 | 50.5% | 60.0% | 52.6% | 83.5 | 1.1% | |
Team Strength Metrics
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.7% | 59.2% | 52.7% | 51.5% | 70.0% |
Player Statistics
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97 | Connor McDavid | C | 77 | 43 | 83 | 126 | +16 | 0 | 39 | 29 | 22:58 | |
| 29 | Leon Draisaitl | C | 65 | 35 | 62 | 97 | +12 | 0 | 34 | 15 | 21:34 | |
| 2 | Evan Bouchard | D | 77 | 21 | 67 | 88 | +22 | 0 | 29 | 94 | 24:39 | |
| 93 | Ryan Nugent-Hopkins | C | 67 | 18 | 35 | 53 | -7 | 0 | 24 | 29 | 19:05 | |
| 18 | Zach Hyman | L | 57 | 31 | 20 | 51 | +13 | 0 | 53 | 18 | 20:01 | |
| 14 | Mattias Ekholm | D | 77 | 6 | 33 | 39 | +27 | 0 | 65 | 113 | 20:35 | |
| 28 | Jack Roslovic | C | 64 | 20 | 14 | 34 | -8 | 0 | 39 | 24 | 15:41 | |
| 92 | Vasily Podkolzin | R | 77 | 17 | 17 | 34 | +15 | 0 | 226 | 44 | 15:14 | |
| 22 | Matt Savoie | C | 77 | 15 | 18 | 33 | +3 | 0 | 14 | 35 | 14:36 | |
| 25 | Darnell Nurse | D | 77 | 7 | 15 | 22 | -14 | 0 | 127 | 161 | 20:53 | |
| 96 | Jake Walman | D | 48 | 8 | 12 | 20 | -12 | 0 | 15 | 86 | 19:01 | |
| 42 | Kasperi Kapanen | R | 36 | 8 | 8 | 16 | +6 | 0 | 69 | 17 | 14:30 | |
| 26 | Andrew Mangiapane → CHI | L | 52 | 7 | 7 | 14 | -19 | 0 | 51 | 19 | 12:35 | |
| 19 | Adam Henrique | C | 60 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -10 | 0 | 29 | 70 | 13:15 | |
| 49 | Ty Emberson | D | 67 | 2 | 10 | 12 | +3 | 0 | 100 | 103 | 15:36 | |
| 13 | Mattias Janmark | C | 43 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -8 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 11:51 | |
| 10 | Trent Frederic | C | 69 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -17 | 0 | 177 | 21 | 10:47 | |
| 20 | Curtis Lazar | C | 41 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -2 | 0 | 83 | 18 | 8:53 | |
| 53 | Isaac Howard | L | 28 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -6 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 10:19 | |
| 15 | Noah Philp → CAR | C | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -7 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 10:02 | |
| 46 | Max Jones | L | 10 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 9:29 | |
| 16 | Jason Dickinson ← CHI | C | 15 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 32 | 13 | 15:13 | |
| 81 | Josh Samanski | C | 20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 21 | 9 | 10:07 | |
| 5 | Connor Murphy ← CHI | D | 15 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 19 | 37 | 20:20 | |
| 75 | Alec Regula | D | 29 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -16 | 0 | 15 | 44 | 14:28 | |
| 27 | Brett Kulak → PIT | D | 31 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -7 | 0 | 4 | 38 | 17:42 | |
| 24 | Spencer Stastney ← NSH | D | 36 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -10 | 0 | 8 | 38 | 16:00 | |
| 34 | Colton Dach ← CHI | C | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5:24 | |
| 61 | Riley Stillman | D | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 12:02 | |
| 28 | Troy Stecher → TOR | D | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13:37 | |
| 15 | Roby Jarventie | L | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8:00 |
Recent Games (Last 10)
| Date | Opponent | Location | Score | Result | Opp Strength | Playoff Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 04 | Vegas Golden Knights | Home | 1 - 5 | L | 52.5% | -0.3% |
| Apr 02 | Chicago Blackhawks | Home | 3 - 1 | W | 40.9% | +0.8% |
| Mar 31 | Seattle Kraken | Home | 3 - 0 | W | 43.0% | +1.9% |
| Mar 28 | Anaheim Ducks | Home | 4 - 2 | W | 50.6% | +3.4% |
| Mar 26 | Vegas Golden Knights | Away | 3 - 4 (OT) | W | 52.5% | +4.5% |
| Mar 24 | Utah Mammoth | Away | 2 - 5 | W | 57.2% | +6.8% |
| Mar 21 | Tampa Bay Lightning | Home | 2 - 5 | L | 67.8% | -4.4% |
| Mar 19 | Florida Panthers | Home | 0 - 4 | L | 44.8% | -5.0% |
| Mar 17 | San Jose Sharks | Home | 5 - 3 | W | 46.2% | +7.3% |
| Mar 15 | Nashville Predators | Home | 3 - 1 | W | 52.7% | +7.1% |
Upcoming Games
| Date | Opponent | Location | Opp Strength | Exp Pts | Playoff Swing | Predicted Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 07, 21:30 | @ Utah Mammoth | Away | 57.2% | 1.07 | 2.5% | UTA (53%) |
| Apr 08, 22:00 | @ San Jose Sharks | Away | 46.2% | 1.14 | 2.8% | EDM (51%) |
| Apr 11, 16:00 | @ Los Angeles Kings | Away | 50.1% | 1.22 | 3.2% | EDM (56%) |
| Apr 13, 21:30 | vs Colorado Avalanche | Home | 68.8% | 1.07 | - | COL (53%) |
| Apr 16, 21:00 | vs Vancouver Canucks | Home | 30.1% | 1.31 | - | EDM (61%) |
| Averages (Next 5 games): | 5.8 pts | 2.8% | ||||
Expected points are calculated based on win probabilities: (2 × win%) + (0.25 × loss%) for overtime losses. Opponent strength ratings help identify which games are easier or harder opportunities to earn points.