Atlantic Division, Eastern Conference
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 100.0% |
|
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Oct 05, 2026
| Opponent | Probability | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
|
|
2.9% | |
|
|
1.7% | |
|
|
1.5% | |
|
|
1.3% | |
|
|
1.3% | |
|
|
1.2% | |
|
|
1.1% | |
|
|
1.1% | |
|
|
0.6% | |
|
|
0.6% |
Probabilities sum to 13.8% (= playoff probability). Remaining 86.2% = miss playoffs.
The Ottawa Senators have officially clinched a playoff berth, with their odds sitting at 100.0% after a massive late-season surge. While a division title is out of reach, Ottawa enters the postseason picture as a legitimate threat, carrying an 11.5% chance to win the conference and a 5.6% shot at the Stanley Cup.
At 43-27-10 through 80 games, Ottawa’s 96 points translate to a 60.0% points percentage, supported by a strong +31 goal differential (272 GF, 241 GA). Their overall team strength rating of 59.0% reflects a balanced profile, slightly better at home (61.5%) than on the road (56.2%). Most encouraging is their recent form at 65.0%, indicating they’re trending upward at exactly the right time. Compared to conference rivals like Pittsburgh (58.1% strength) and Boston (54.7%), Ottawa stacks up very well analytically and looks more like a mid-tier playoff seed than a fringe team.
Montreal (104 points) and Pittsburgh (98) sit ahead in the standings and are essentially locked into their positions, while Ottawa and Boston are tied at 96 points. Philadelphia, currently on the cutline at 94 points with a projected 96.1, remains the only team with realistic motivation to push upward, but Ottawa’s berth is secure. The Senators are projected to finish with 98.5 points, narrowly ahead of Boston’s 98.3 projection, meaning seeding could still shuffle slightly. However, with Columbus, Washington, Detroit, and the Islanders all below 93 projected points, there is no longer any danger of falling out.
Ottawa has just two games left, one at home and one on the road, with an opponent strength of 46.2%, well below the league average of 52.7%, making this an objectively easy closing stretch. The schedule is balanced in terms of venue, and the Senators are projected to collect 2.5 more points, which would bring them close to 99 points overall. With the playoff cutoff projected at 96.1 points, they’ve already cleared the bar, but strong opponents elsewhere in the standings mean every additional point could influence first-round matchups.
The Senators have done the hard part by clinching and now shift into positioning mode with momentum on their side. Their combination of a positive goal differential, strong recent play, and favorable closing schedule suggests they’ll enter the playoffs confident and dangerous. While they won’t win the division, Ottawa profiles as a capable middle seed that few higher-ranked teams will be eager to face.
Why you should jump on the bandwagon:
If you’re looking for a team that feels like it’s arriving right on time, Ottawa makes a compelling case. Brady Tkachuk sets the tone every night — physical, emotional, and always around the net — and Tim Stützle gives them a genuine game-breaker down the middle with his speed and creativity. Drake Batherson and Claude Giroux round out a top six that can score in different ways, while Jake Sanderson has quietly become one of the more complete young defensemen in the conference. There’s real star power here, but it’s balanced.
The bigger storyline is that this core is no longer theoretical. After years of “they’re coming,” the Senators have turned potential into a 97-point season with a +30 goal differential. They’re not sneaking in — they earned their spot in a loaded Atlantic. Linus Ullmark stabilizing the crease has given them calmer nights defensively, and Thomas Chabot doesn’t have to carry the entire blue line anymore with Sanderson alongside him. It feels like a roster that’s grown up together.
They’re fun because they don’t play cautious. Ottawa will trade chances, lean into the physical edge Tkachuk brings, and trust their skill to win stretches of chaos. They can score (275 goals) but they’re sturdier than past versions, and their recent form suggests they’re trending the right way at the right time. If you want a team that blends bite, skill, and a bit of unfinished-business energy, the Senators are easy to get behind.
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Understanding the factors that drive the 13.8% playoff probability
Playoff probabilities are calculated through Monte Carlo simulation, running 10,000+ scenarios of the remaining season. Each game is simulated based on team strength ratings, home ice advantage (~55% win rate), and opponent matchups.
Projected to finish with 80–91 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 94–97 points. Finishes above the cutline in 15.4% of simulations.
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 79 | 57.2% | 80.0% | 50.9% | 89.5 | 26.3% | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | 80 | 59.5% | 60.0% | 51.0% | 93.4 | 44.4% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 79 | 44.0% | 75.0% | 52.8% | 100.5 | 75.9% | |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 79 | 38.2% | 35.0% | 51.8% | 93.9 | 46.8% | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 81 | 70.6% | 30.0% | 50.9% | 85.5 | 13.8% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 61.5% | 85.0% | 52.0% | 104.9 | 89.3% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 43.8% | 50.0% | 52.5% | 96.5 | 59.5% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 41.4% | 55.0% | 51.7% | 94.2 | 48.5% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 67.2% | 30.0% | 51.9% | 106.1 | 91.6% | |
| Game | Impact | |
|---|---|---|
| BOS vs OTT | OTT playing |
BOS win:
-1.9%
OTT win:
+3.0%
|
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70.6% | 42.4% | 38.2% | 69.2% | 30.0% |
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | Tim Stützle | C | 81 | 34 | 50 | 84 | +8 | 0 | 129 | 46 | 20:18 | |
| 19 | Drake Batherson | R | 80 | 33 | 36 | 69 | -8 | 0 | 124 | 22 | 17:21 | |
| 24 | Dylan Cozens | C | 83 | 29 | 30 | 59 | -8 | 0 | 217 | 25 | 17:01 | |
| 85 | Jake Sanderson | D | 68 | 14 | 41 | 55 | +16 | 0 | 30 | 130 | 24:32 | |
| 28 | Claude Giroux | R | 83 | 14 | 38 | 52 | +20 | 0 | 66 | 27 | 16:19 | |
| 12 | Shane Pinto | C | 73 | 23 | 24 | 47 | +6 | 0 | 98 | 50 | 18:44 | |
| 22 | Michael Amadio | R | 82 | 16 | 20 | 36 | +14 | 0 | 107 | 52 | 16:09 | |
| 20 | Fabian Zetterlund | L | 83 | 17 | 17 | 34 | +1 | 0 | 156 | 32 | 12:53 | |
| 72 | Thomas Chabot | D | 58 | 8 | 24 | 32 | +8 | 0 | 36 | 119 | 22:39 | |
| 10 | Jordan Spence | D | 74 | 7 | 24 | 31 | +14 | 0 | 54 | 59 | 18:45 | |
| 21 | Nick Cousins | C | 82 | 9 | 14 | 23 | +8 | 0 | 171 | 43 | 11:22 | |
| 43 | Tyler Kleven | D | 71 | 3 | 15 | 18 | +2 | 0 | 129 | 97 | 17:23 | |
| 34 | Stephen Halliday | C | 31 | 5 | 7 | 12 | +2 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 8:33 | |
| 37 | Warren Foegele | L | 22 | 6 | 2 | 8 | +7 | 0 | 27 | 9 | 11:39 | |
| 33 | Nikolas Matinpalo | D | 51 | 0 | 5 | 5 | -1 | 0 | 50 | 56 | 15:41 | |
| 26 | Carter Yakemchuk | D | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15:11 | |
| 42 | Hayden Hodgson | R | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 9:05 | |
| 95 | Andre Burakovsky ← CHI | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 27 | William Eklund ← SJS | L | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16:16 | |
| 2 | Artem Zub | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | Cameron Crotty | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 56 | Jorian Donovan | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 23 | Kurtis MacDermid | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 60 | Lassi Thomson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 71 | Ridly Greig | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 53 | Xavier Bourgault | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | Nick Jensen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | Brady Tkachuk | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 44 | Dennis Gilbert | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 20 | Lars Eller | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 57 | David Perron | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Date | Opponent | Location | Score | Result | Opp Strength | Playoff Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 03 | Toronto Maple Leafs | Away | 2 - 3 | W | 38.2% | +4.0% |
| Sep 26 | Montréal Canadiens | Away | 4 - 2 | L | 59.5% | - |
| Sep 26 | Montréal Canadiens | Home | 4 - 3 | W | 59.5% | - |
| Sep 23 | Toronto Maple Leafs | Home | 2 - 4 | L | 38.2% | - |
| Sep 23 | Toronto Maple Leafs | Away | 6 - 1 | L | 38.2% | - |
| Sep 21 | Montréal Canadiens | Away | 3 - 2 (OT) | OTL | 59.5% | - |
| Apr 25 | Carolina Hurricanes | Home | 2 - 4 | L | 44.0% | - |
| Apr 23 | Carolina Hurricanes | Home | 1 - 2 | L | 44.0% | - |
| Apr 20 | Carolina Hurricanes | Away | 3 - 2 (OT) | OTL | 44.0% | - |
| Apr 18 | Carolina Hurricanes | Away | 2 - 0 | L | 44.0% | - |
| Date | Opponent | Location | Opp Strength | Exp Pts | Playoff Swing | Predicted Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 12:00 | @ Carolina Hurricanes | Away | 44.0% | 0.90 | - | CAR (63%) |
| Apr 30, 12:00 | vs Carolina Hurricanes | Home | 44.0% | 0.97 | - | CAR (59%) |
| May 02, 12:00 | @ Carolina Hurricanes | Away | 44.0% | 0.90 | - | CAR (63%) |
| Oct 05, 19:30 | @ Boston Bruins | Away | 59.3% | 0.92 | 4.9% | BOS (62%) |
| Oct 06, 19:00 | @ Detroit Red Wings | Away | 14.9% | 0.82 | 4.6% | DET (68%) |
| Oct 08, 19:00 | vs Philadelphia Flyers | Home | 20.3% | 1.21 | 4.0% | OTT (55%) |
| Oct 10, 19:00 | vs Nashville Predators | Home | 39.0% | 1.18 | 4.0% | OTT (53%) |
| Oct 12, 19:00 | @ New Jersey Devils | Away | 34.2% | 1.11 | - | NJD (51%) |
| Oct 13, 19:30 | vs St. Louis Blues | Home | 47.5% | 1.10 | - | STL (51%) |
| Oct 15, 19:00 | vs New York Islanders | Home | 67.2% | 0.89 | - | NYI (63%) |
| Averages (Next 10 games): | 10.0 pts | 4.4% | ||||
Expected points are calculated based on win probabilities: (2 × win%) + (0.25 × loss%) for overtime losses. Opponent strength ratings help identify which games are easier or harder opportunities to earn points.