New York Islanders ELIMINATED
Metropolitan Division, Eastern Conference
Current Standings
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 43 | 34 | 5 | 91 | 233 | 241 | -8 | 55.5% |
|
Playoff Probabilities
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Apr 17, 2026
Likely First-Round Opponents
| Opponent | Probability | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
Pittsburgh Penguins
|
1.6% |
Probabilities sum to 0.0% (= playoff probability). Remaining 100.0% = miss playoffs.
Analysis
Summary
The New York Islanders are clinging to faint playoff hopes with a 3.3% chance of qualifying, despite a recent jump of nearly 10 percentage points. At 91 points with two games remaining, they likely need to win out and get help to have any shot at the final Eastern Conference wild-card spot.
Record and Recent Performance
At 43-32-5 (91 points in 80 games), the Islanders own a 56.9% points percentage and a minus-4 goal differential (231 goals for, 235 against), which reflects a team that has hovered around break-even most of the year. Their overall strength rating sits at 49.6%, slightly below league average, with a modest edge at home (51.5%) compared to the road (48.8%). Recent form has dipped to 40.0%, suggesting inconsistency down the stretch, though their playoff probability bump indicates they’ve at least kept themselves mathematically alive while others have stumbled.
The Competition
The Islanders sit 12th in the conference at 91 points, three back of Philadelphia (94 points), which currently holds the second wild card and is projected to finish around 96.1 points. Columbus has 92 points and Washington and Detroit are level with New York at 91, creating a four-team cluster chasing the Flyers. The problem is that Philadelphia still projects to reach 96 points, meaning the Islanders likely need 95 points to have a realistic chance — and even that might not be enough without regulation losses from the Flyers. Montreal, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, and Boston are already safely in, so this is strictly a scramble for the final berth.
Remaining Schedule
The Islanders have two games left, both at home, but the degree of difficulty is high: their remaining opponents carry a combined 63.9% strength rating, well above the 52.7% league average. The model projects just 2.1 more points for New York, putting them at 93.1 — short of the projected 96.1-point cutoff. Even if they outperform projections and earn four points to reach 95, they would still need Philadelphia to falter in its final two games and likely need to outpace Columbus and Washington as well.
Outlook
The path is narrow and requires near-perfection plus help, which explains the 3.3% playoff odds. The Islanders must win both remaining games in regulation and hope the Flyers leave the door open; anything less almost certainly ends their season. While not mathematically eliminated, they are firmly in long-shot territory heading into the final stretch.
Bandwagon Options
Your team's playoff hopes are fading — here are some teams worth cheering for:
Colorado Avalanche
Central · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 16 | 11 | 121 | +99 | 69.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you want to jump on a true powerhouse, Colorado is the easy sell. Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar drive one of the fastest, most explosive teams in the league, and they can overwhelm opponents in waves. It’s stress-free, high-skill hockey with legit Cup expectations.
Dallas Stars
Central · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 20 | 12 | 112 | +53 | 65.7% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Dallas offers a more structured, balanced vibe that Islanders fans can appreciate. They defend well, roll multiple lines, and get strong goaltending — but still have elite difference-makers like Jason Robertson and Miro Heiskanen. It’s a deep, well-built team that feels built for a long run.
Edmonton Oilers
Pacific · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 30 | 11 | 93 | +13 | 57.2% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you’d rather just enjoy superstar brilliance, Edmonton is the ticket. Watching Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl in a playoff series is pure spectacle, and every game feels like it could turn on a moment of magic. It’s a fun change of pace from the grind-it-out style you’re used to.
Anaheim Ducks
Pacific · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 33 | 6 | 92 | -15 | 46.5% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Anaheim is a sneaky underdog pick with nothing to lose. They’ve battled their way into the mix despite a negative goal differential, and that scrappy, chip-on-the-shoulder energy can be easy to rally behind. If you enjoy rooting for a team trying to shock everyone, this is your bandwagon.
Buffalo Sabres
Atlantic · Eastern| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 23 | 9 | 109 | +47 | 62.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Buffalo gives you a nearby, non-rival Eastern Conference team with a great story. They’ve built a fast, confident group that can score in bunches, and there’s something fun about backing a long-suffering fan base chasing a breakthrough. Close enough to feel familiar, far enough to avoid rivalry baggage.
Required Win Percentage for Playoffs
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Points Distribution vs. Cutline
Projected to finish with 91–91 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 98–98 points. Finishes above the cutline in 0.0% of simulations.
Team Projection
Playoff Cutline
Playoff Race — Eastern Conference
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 106 | 82 | 0 | 60.9% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 106.0 | 100.0% | |
| 5 | 100 | 82 | 0 | 57.4% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 100.0 | 100.0% | |
| 6 | 99 | 82 | 0 | 59.2% | 65.0% | 50.0% | 99.0 | 100.0% | |
| 7 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 55.2% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 8 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 57.6% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 9 | 95 | 82 | 0 | 60.2% | 80.0% | 50.0% | 95.0 | 0.0% | |
| 10 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.1% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 11 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 12 | 91 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 91.0 | 0.0% | |
Team Strength Metrics
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.8% | 47.3% | 47.2% | 48.3% | 30.0% |
Player Statistics
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Mathew Barzal | C | 80 | 19 | 52 | 71 | +13 | 0 | 29 | 50 | 20:39 | |
| 48 | Matthew Schaefer | D | 81 | 23 | 36 | 59 | +14 | 0 | 40 | 110 | 24:40 | |
| 14 | Bo Horvat | C | 68 | 31 | 26 | 57 | +8 | 0 | 51 | 38 | 20:45 | |
| 27 | Anders Lee | L | 81 | 19 | 23 | 42 | +2 | 0 | 89 | 37 | 15:37 | |
| 92 | Simon Holmstrom | R | 78 | 19 | 22 | 41 | +4 | 0 | 16 | 45 | 16:41 | |
| 44 | Jean-Gabriel Pageau | C | 73 | 17 | 18 | 35 | +2 | 0 | 114 | 51 | 15:40 | |
| 77 | Tony DeAngelo | D | 75 | 5 | 29 | 34 | -4 | 0 | 33 | 70 | 19:07 | |
| 51 | Emil Heineman | L | 81 | 22 | 9 | 31 | -11 | 0 | 247 | 54 | 16:34 | |
| 64 | Calum Ritchie | C | 64 | 13 | 16 | 29 | -14 | 0 | 17 | 34 | 13:24 | |
| 6 | Ryan Pulock | D | 75 | 3 | 24 | 27 | +9 | 0 | 49 | 146 | 20:52 | |
| 11 | Anthony Duclair | L | 61 | 11 | 15 | 26 | +3 | 0 | 9 | 41 | 13:08 | |
| 92 | Jonathan Drouin → STL | L | 54 | 3 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 0 | 13 | 25 | 17:09 | |
| 53 | Casey Cizikas | C | 80 | 10 | 8 | 18 | -3 | 0 | 153 | 57 | 11:46 | |
| 21 | Kyle Palmieri | C | 25 | 6 | 12 | 18 | -2 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 18:52 | |
| 49 | Max Shabanov | R | 43 | 5 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 0 | 27 | 16 | 13:41 | |
| 3 | Adam Pelech | D | 81 | 4 | 12 | 16 | +5 | 0 | 66 | 124 | 20:52 | |
| 24 | Scott Mayfield | D | 79 | 2 | 12 | 14 | -9 | 0 | 73 | 82 | 16:30 | |
| 10 | Brayden Schenn ← STL | C | 19 | 6 | 5 | 11 | -5 | 0 | 42 | 13 | 17:03 | |
| 16 | Marc Gatcomb | C | 49 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 0 | 192 | 24 | 10:05 | |
| 32 | Kyle MacLean | C | 58 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -6 | 0 | 120 | 21 | 10:31 | |
| 81 | Ondrej Palat | L | 29 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -8 | 0 | 44 | 26 | 12:56 | |
| 4 | Carson Soucy | D | 30 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -10 | 0 | 34 | 24 | 15:27 | |
| 34 | Adam Boqvist | D | 27 | 0 | 4 | 4 | -8 | 0 | 11 | 23 | 13:11 | |
| 42 | Maxim Tsyplakov | R | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -9 | 0 | 45 | 4 | 9:39 | |
| 36 | Isaiah George | D | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 13:22 | |
| 73 | Victor Eklund | R | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15:30 | |
| 28 | Alexander Romanov | D | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -7 | 0 | 31 | 31 | 19:26 | |
| 43 | Liam Foudy | C | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11:17 | |
| 4 | Cole McWard | D | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 13:44 |
Recent Games (Last 10)
| Date | Opponent | Location | Score | Result | Opp Strength | Playoff Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14 | Carolina Hurricanes | Home | 1 - 2 | L | 65.8% | 0.0% |
| Apr 12 | Montréal Canadiens | Home | 1 - 4 | L | 60.9% | -1.4% |
| Apr 11 | Ottawa Senators | Home | 0 - 3 | L | 59.2% | -15.9% |
| Apr 09 | Toronto Maple Leafs | Home | 5 - 3 | W | 40.1% | +6.8% |
| Apr 04 | Carolina Hurricanes | Away | 4 - 3 | L | 65.8% | -12.1% |
| Apr 03 | Philadelphia Flyers | Home | 1 - 4 | L | 57.6% | -16.0% |
| Mar 31 | Buffalo Sabres | Away | 4 - 3 | L | 62.3% | -11.0% |
| Mar 30 | Pittsburgh Penguins | Home | 3 - 8 | L | 55.2% | -12.0% |
| Mar 28 | Florida Panthers | Home | 5 - 2 | W | 49.0% | +9.0% |
| Mar 26 | Dallas Stars | Home | 2 - 1 | W | 65.7% | +10.9% |