Detroit Red Wings ELIMINATED
Atlantic Division, Eastern Conference
Current Standings
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 41 | 31 | 10 | 92 | 241 | 258 | -17 | 56.1% |
|
Playoff Probabilities
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Apr 17, 2026
Likely First-Round Opponents
| Opponent | Probability | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
Carolina Hurricanes
|
3.2% | |
Buffalo Sabres
|
0.6% |
Probabilities sum to 0.0% (= playoff probability). Remaining 100.0% = miss playoffs.
Analysis
Summary
The Red Wings are clinging to faint playoff hopes, sitting at just a 4.7% chance to qualify with four games remaining. At 89 points, Detroit likely needs to reach at least 96 or 97 to have a realistic shot, meaning they must be nearly perfect down the stretch and get help.
Record and Recent Performance
Detroit’s 40-29-9 record translates to a 57.1% points percentage, solid but not strong enough in a crowded Eastern race. Their -10 goal differential (228 scored, 238 allowed) reflects a team that has struggled to consistently outplay opponents, and their 48.0% overall strength rating backs that up. More concerning is a recent form rating of 35.0%, suggesting they’ve cooled off at the worst possible time. With middling home (48.4%) and road (49.5%) strength splits, there’s no clear situational edge to lean on in the final week.
The Competition
The cutline currently sits with Philadelphia at 92 points and a projected 96.5, while Ottawa is slightly ahead at 92 and trending toward 97. Pittsburgh and Boston are effectively locked in at 96 points each, and Montreal is far out of reach. That leaves Detroit chasing not just one team but likely two, as Columbus (90 points) and the Islanders (89) are also in the mix. Given projections have Detroit finishing at 93.3 points, they would need to outperform Ottawa and Philadelphia by multiple points over just four games, while also holding off Columbus and New York — a parlay that explains the sub-5% odds.
Remaining Schedule
Detroit has four games left, evenly split between home and road, against opponents averaging a 53.2% strength rating, slightly above league average. The schedule is considered balanced and of average difficulty, with 4.3 expected points — roughly a 2-1-1 finish. However, the projected playoff cutoff is 96.5 points, meaning Detroit likely needs at least seven of eight possible points to push into serious contention. Anything short of three wins probably leaves them watching the scoreboard and coming up short.
Outlook
The math is daunting: Detroit needs a near-perfect finish and multiple stumbles from teams directly ahead. With below-average underlying strength and poor recent form, their 4.7% playoff probability feels realistic. While not mathematically eliminated, the Red Wings’ postseason path is narrow and largely out of their control.
Bandwagon Options
Your team's playoff hopes are fading — here are some teams worth cheering for:
Colorado Avalanche
Central · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 16 | 11 | 121 | +99 | 69.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you want to watch a true heavyweight, Colorado is the easy pick. Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar drive one of the fastest, most explosive teams in the league, and they’ve got the depth to make a long run. It’s pure, high-end playoff hockey every night.
Dallas Stars
Central · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 20 | 12 | 112 | +53 | 65.7% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Dallas offers a great mix of structure and star power, with a deep forward group and a blue line that can control a series. They play a smart, playoff-ready style that Wings fans can appreciate, especially if you miss those tight, disciplined Detroit teams of the past. They’re built to win four rounds.
Edmonton Oilers
Pacific · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 30 | 11 | 93 | +13 | 57.2% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you’re in the mood for offense, Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl are must-watch. Edmonton games feel like they can swing on a single shift, and the power play is electric. It’s a fun, low-stakes Western Conference bandwagon with superstar drama baked in.
Anaheim Ducks
Pacific · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 33 | 6 | 92 | -15 | 46.5% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Anaheim is your underdog option. They’ve battled their way into the picture with a negative goal differential, which makes every win feel scrappy and earned. If you like rooting for a young group trying to prove it belongs, this is a sneaky fun ride.
Carolina Hurricanes
Metropolitan · Eastern| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | 22 | 7 | 113 | +56 | 65.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Carolina plays a relentless, puck-possession style that overwhelms teams over a seven-game series. They roll four lines, attack in waves, and rarely beat themselves. If you want a team that looks engineered for a deep run, the Hurricanes are a safe and satisfying bet.
Required Win Percentage for Playoffs
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Points Distribution vs. Cutline
Projected to finish with 92–92 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 98–98 points. Finishes above the cutline in 0.0% of simulations.
Team Projection
Playoff Cutline
Playoff Race — Eastern Conference
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 106 | 82 | 0 | 60.9% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 106.0 | 100.0% | |
| 5 | 100 | 82 | 0 | 57.4% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 100.0 | 100.0% | |
| 6 | 99 | 82 | 0 | 59.2% | 65.0% | 50.0% | 99.0 | 100.0% | |
| 7 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 55.2% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 8 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 57.6% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 9 | 95 | 82 | 0 | 60.2% | 80.0% | 50.0% | 95.0 | 0.0% | |
| 10 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.1% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 11 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 12 | 91 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 91.0 | 0.0% | |
Team Strength Metrics
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.1% | 47.0% | 47.0% | 46.6% | 30.0% |
Player Statistics
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | Alex DeBrincat | R | 82 | 41 | 44 | 85 | +7 | 0 | 38 | 39 | 18:29 | |
| 23 | Lucas Raymond | L | 80 | 25 | 51 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 28 | 18:48 | |
| 71 | Dylan Larkin | C | 74 | 34 | 33 | 67 | +3 | 0 | 46 | 33 | 20:09 | |
| 53 | Moritz Seider | D | 82 | 10 | 50 | 60 | +16 | 0 | 128 | 181 | 25:39 | |
| 88 | Patrick Kane | R | 67 | 16 | 41 | 57 | -1 | 0 | 21 | 23 | 17:41 | |
| 18 | Andrew Copp | C | 79 | 9 | 34 | 43 | +3 | 0 | 45 | 64 | 16:34 | |
| 21 | James van Riemsdyk | L | 72 | 15 | 16 | 31 | -17 | 0 | 15 | 28 | 11:43 | |
| 58 | Emmitt Finnie | C | 82 | 13 | 17 | 30 | -9 | 0 | 131 | 41 | 15:29 | |
| 37 | J.T. Compher | L | 82 | 11 | 17 | 28 | -14 | 0 | 22 | 54 | 15:41 | |
| 77 | Simon Edvinsson | D | 72 | 9 | 16 | 25 | +13 | 0 | 94 | 148 | 22:22 | |
| 44 | Axel Sandin-Pellikka | D | 68 | 7 | 14 | 21 | -20 | 0 | 17 | 54 | 16:10 | |
| 92 | Marco Kasper | C | 81 | 9 | 10 | 19 | -19 | 0 | 186 | 49 | 13:46 | |
| 8 | Ben Chiarot | D | 82 | 5 | 10 | 15 | -9 | 0 | 170 | 162 | 20:50 | |
| 27 | Michael Rasmussen | C | 64 | 6 | 8 | 14 | -10 | 0 | 64 | 63 | 12:38 | |
| 22 | Mason Appleton | C | 65 | 6 | 8 | 14 | -4 | 0 | 89 | 29 | 13:30 | |
| 20 | Albert Johansson | D | 82 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -18 | 0 | 56 | 93 | 15:53 | |
| 72 | Justin Faulk ← STL | D | 17 | 5 | 3 | 8 | -6 | 0 | 21 | 30 | 20:24 | |
| 29 | Jonatan Berggren → STL | R | 15 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -3 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 11:59 | |
| 25 | Jacob Bernard-Docker | D | 63 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 86 | 14:46 | |
| 43 | John Leonard | L | 11 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -3 | 0 | 12 | 9 | 11:30 | |
| 65 | Dominik Shine | R | 18 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 7:01 | |
| 57 | David Perron ← OTT | L | 16 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -9 | 0 | 26 | 5 | 13:55 | |
| 25 | Elmer Soderblom → PIT | L | 39 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -4 | 0 | 64 | 11 | 10:40 | |
| 52 | Travis Hamonic | D | 26 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -11 | 0 | 32 | 41 | 14:22 | |
| 56 | Erik Gustafsson | D | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20:06 | |
| 34 | Carter Mazur | L | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 10:38 | |
| 15 | Sheldon Dries | C | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 6:58 | |
| 28 | Michael Brandsegg-Nygård | R | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 12:38 |
Recent Games (Last 10)
| Date | Opponent | Location | Score | Result | Opp Strength | Playoff Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15 | Florida Panthers | Away | 8 - 1 | L | 49.0% | 0.0% |
| Apr 13 | Tampa Bay Lightning | Away | 4 - 3 (OT) | OTL | 60.0% | 0.0% |
| Apr 11 | New Jersey Devils | Home | 3 - 5 | L | 49.4% | -3.6% |
| Apr 09 | Philadelphia Flyers | Home | 6 - 3 | W | 57.6% | +4.2% |
| Apr 07 | Columbus Blue Jackets | Home | 3 - 4 (OT) | OTL | 46.8% | -7.6% |
| Apr 05 | Minnesota Wild | Home | 4 - 5 | L | 59.1% | -10.7% |
| Apr 04 | New York Rangers | Away | 4 - 1 | L | 49.9% | -12.4% |
| Apr 02 | Philadelphia Flyers | Away | 2 - 4 | W | 57.6% | +11.1% |
| Mar 31 | Pittsburgh Penguins | Away | 5 - 1 | L | 55.2% | -10.2% |
| Mar 28 | Philadelphia Flyers | Home | 3 - 5 | L | 57.6% | -10.4% |