Metropolitan Division, Eastern Conference
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 50.0% |
|
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Oct 05, 2026
| Opponent | Probability | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
|
|
1.4% | |
|
|
1.2% | |
|
|
1.2% | |
|
|
0.7% |
Probabilities sum to 6.1% (= playoff probability). Remaining 93.9% = miss playoffs.
The New Jersey Devils are on the fringes of the Eastern Conference race with just a 1.5% playoff probability, reflecting how steep their climb has become. At 58 points through 57 games, they would need a near-perfect finish and significant help from multiple teams ahead of them to stay alive.
New Jersey’s 28-27-2 record translates to a 50.9% points percentage, well below typical playoff pace, and their minus-29 goal differential underscores season-long defensive issues. The team strength rating of 43.8% places them near the bottom of the conference, and recent form at 40.0% suggests they have not shown the sustained surge required to close gaps in the standings. Even with modestly better home (44.6%) and away (44.4%) splits, the Devils have played like a sub-.500 team overall.
The Devils sit 15th in the conference, already 11 points behind the Islanders at the current cutline of 69 points and projected to finish at 96.7. Teams directly ahead such as Washington (65 points), Columbus (65), and Ottawa (63) all project well above New Jersey’s 84.9-point finish, while stronger contenders like Boston, Pittsburgh, and Buffalo are tracking near or above 100 points. With so many teams to pass and several of them posting significantly higher strength ratings, gaining ground is highly unrealistic at this stage.
New Jersey has 25 games left with a favorable 14 at home and an average overall schedule difficulty, facing opponents with a 52.2% strength rating. That said, the model expects just 26.9 additional points from those games, which would leave them more than 10 points short of the projected playoff cutoff. Even outperforming expectations by several wins would still require multiple teams above them to collapse simultaneously.
While the Devils are not mathematically eliminated, their playoff path is extremely narrow and depends on a dramatic and sustained turnaround that has not appeared all season. Realistically, the final stretch is more about player development, evaluating the roster, and building momentum for next year rather than chasing a postseason berth.
Your team's playoff hopes are fading — here are some teams worth cheering for:
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | +9 | 82.3% | 70.6% | 2.1% |
If you miss watching elite, game-breaking talent every night, Colorado delivers with Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar driving one of the most explosive teams in the league. They play fast, aggressive, skill-heavy hockey that’s easy to fall in love with. As a Western Conference powerhouse, you can jump on without dealing with Metro baggage.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -5 | 12.4% | 93.0% | 12.8% |
Dallas is a balanced contender with depth down the middle, strong goaltending, and a blue line that can both defend and push play. They’re built the way Devils fans appreciate — structured but still dangerous offensively. It’s a steady, professional group that looks built for a long run out West.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 43.8% | 59.5% | 1.9% |
If you want to stick in the East without cheering a rival, Buffalo is a fun, offense-first team that feels a bit like a Devils cousin. They’ve leaned into young skill and play with pace, and their fan base is starving for a breakthrough. There’s something relatable about riding with a talented group trying to take the next step.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | +2 | 72.1% | 15.5% | 0.1% |
Anaheim is your underdog-with-upside option. They’re not the flashiest contender, but they’ve scratched and clawed their way into the picture and play a scrappy, resilient style. It’s low-pressure bandwagoning — if they make noise, you look like a genius for hopping on early.
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Understanding the factors that drive the 6.1% playoff probability
Playoff probabilities are calculated through Monte Carlo simulation, running 10,000+ scenarios of the remaining season. Each game is simulated based on team strength ratings, home ice advantage (~55% win rate), and opponent matchups.
Projected to finish with 76–88 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 94–97 points. Finishes above the cutline in 7.5% of simulations.
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 79 | 57.2% | 80.0% | 50.9% | 89.5 | 26.3% | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | 80 | 59.5% | 60.0% | 51.0% | 93.4 | 44.4% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 79 | 44.0% | 75.0% | 52.8% | 100.5 | 75.9% | |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 79 | 38.2% | 35.0% | 51.8% | 93.9 | 46.8% | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 81 | 70.6% | 30.0% | 50.9% | 85.5 | 13.8% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 61.5% | 85.0% | 52.0% | 104.9 | 89.3% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 43.8% | 50.0% | 52.5% | 96.5 | 59.5% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 41.4% | 55.0% | 51.7% | 94.2 | 48.5% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 67.2% | 30.0% | 51.9% | 106.1 | 91.6% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 52.2% | 96.4 | 58.6% | |
| 14 | 2 | 3 | 79 | 20.3% | 30.0% | 53.7% | 77.7 | 2.0% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 34.2% | 65.0% | 53.3% | 82.0 | 6.1% | |
| 16 | 0 | 2 | 80 | 14.9% | 40.0% | 53.1% | 107.2 | 93.6% | |
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.2% | 39.6% | 35.6% | 12.3% | 65.0% |
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Jack Hughes | C | 63 | 28 | 50 | 78 | +1 | 0 | 4 | 33 | 21:22 | |
| 63 | Jesper Bratt | L | 84 | 22 | 50 | 72 | -10 | 0 | 76 | 24 | 18:45 | |
| 13 | Nico Hischier | C | 84 | 28 | 37 | 65 | -5 | 0 | 60 | 64 | 20:40 | |
| 28 | Timo Meier | R | 79 | 24 | 20 | 44 | -18 | 0 | 137 | 52 | 18:30 | |
| 91 | Dawson Mercer | C | 84 | 20 | 22 | 42 | -4 | 0 | 34 | 48 | 18:09 | |
| 7 | Dougie Hamilton | D | 79 | 13 | 26 | 39 | -6 | 0 | 90 | 81 | 21:32 | |
| 43 | Luke Hughes | D | 70 | 7 | 29 | 36 | -3 | 0 | 19 | 54 | 23:00 | |
| 81 | Arseny Gritsyuk | R | 68 | 13 | 18 | 31 | -6 | 0 | 61 | 20 | 15:13 | |
| 12 | Cody Glass | C | 72 | 19 | 7 | 26 | +2 | 0 | 44 | 41 | 13:30 | |
| 71 | Jonas Siegenthaler | D | 84 | 0 | 16 | 16 | -12 | 0 | 93 | 140 | 19:30 | |
| 5 | Brenden Dillon | D | 84 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -14 | 0 | 205 | 107 | 17:54 | |
| 11 | Stefan Noesen | R | 40 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -14 | 0 | 37 | 15 | 11:32 | |
| 22 | Brett Pesce | D | 39 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -10 | 0 | 12 | 80 | 20:14 | |
| 77 | Luke Evangelista | R | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 18:32 | |
| 17 | Evan Rodrigues ← FLA | C | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 16:43 | |
| 47 | Declan Chisholm ← WSH | D | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13:36 | |
| 70 | Jesper Boqvist ← FLA | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 39 | Anthony Mantha ← PIT | R | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16:16 | |
| 93 | Amadeus Lombardi | C | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:08 | |
| 16 | Connor Brown | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 44 | Dennis Cholowski | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 33 | Evgenii Dadonov | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | Johnathan Kovacevic | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 83 | Juho Lammikko | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 29 | Lenni Hameenaho | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 21 | Marc McLaughlin | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 72 | Nick Bjugstad | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 38 | Topias Vilen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 19 | Zack MacEwen | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | Colton White | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 48 | Brian Halonen | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 71 | Simon Nemec | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 47 | Paul Cotter | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 72 | Maxim Tsyplakov | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 41 | Luke Glendening | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 81 | Ondrej Palat | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Date | Opponent | Location | Score | Result | Opp Strength | Playoff Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 03 | New York Islanders | Away | 6 - 0 | L | 67.2% | -1.9% |
| Oct 01 | Philadelphia Flyers | Home | 3 - 2 (OT) | W | 20.3% | +4.7% |
| Sep 26 | New York Islanders | Away | 1 - 4 | W | 67.2% | - |
| Sep 24 | New York Rangers | Away | 4 - 3 (OT) | OTL | 73.0% | - |
| Sep 21 | New York Rangers | Home | 3 - 2 | W | 73.0% | - |
| Sep 20 | New York Islanders | Home | 2 - 1 | W | 67.2% | - |
| Apr 14 | Boston Bruins | Away | 4 - 0 | L | 59.3% | 0.0% |
| Apr 12 | Ottawa Senators | Home | 4 - 3 (OT) | W | 70.6% | 0.0% |
| Apr 11 | Detroit Red Wings | Away | 3 - 5 | W | 14.9% | 0.0% |
| Apr 09 | Pittsburgh Penguins | Home | 2 - 5 | L | 86.6% | 0.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Location | Opp Strength | Exp Pts | Playoff Swing | Predicted Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 06, 19:00 | vs Utah Mammoth | Home | 73.6% | 0.95 | 2.2% | UTA (60%) |
| Oct 10, 15:30 | vs Vancouver Canucks | Home | 49.4% | 1.09 | 2.2% | VAN (52%) |
| Oct 12, 19:00 | vs Ottawa Senators | Home | 70.6% | 1.14 | - | NJD (51%) |
| Oct 13, 18:00 | @ Detroit Red Wings | Away | 14.9% | 0.79 | - | DET (69%) |
| Oct 15, 19:00 | vs New York Rangers | Home | 73.0% | 1.03 | - | NYR (55%) |
| Oct 17, 13:00 | @ Washington Capitals | Away | 61.5% | 0.79 | - | WSH (69%) |
| Oct 20, 19:00 | vs Colorado Avalanche | Home | 82.3% | 0.98 | - | COL (58%) |
| Oct 22, 19:00 | vs Anaheim Ducks | Home | 72.1% | 1.18 | - | NJD (53%) |
| Oct 24, 15:30 | vs Los Angeles Kings | Home | 27.2% | 0.92 | - | LAK (62%) |
| Oct 27, 20:00 | @ Dallas Stars | Away | 12.4% | 0.79 | - | DAL (69%) |
| Averages (Next 10 games): | 9.7 pts | 2.2% | ||||
Expected points are calculated based on win probabilities: (2 × win%) + (0.25 × loss%) for overtime losses. Opponent strength ratings help identify which games are easier or harder opportunities to earn points.