Metropolitan Division, Eastern Conference
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 42 | 37 | 3 | 87 | 230 | 254 | -24 | 53.0% |
|
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Apr 17, 2026
The New Jersey Devils are on the fringes of the Eastern Conference race with just a 1.5% playoff probability, reflecting how steep their climb has become. At 58 points through 57 games, they would need a near-perfect finish and significant help from multiple teams ahead of them to stay alive.
New Jersey’s 28-27-2 record translates to a 50.9% points percentage, well below typical playoff pace, and their minus-29 goal differential underscores season-long defensive issues. The team strength rating of 43.8% places them near the bottom of the conference, and recent form at 40.0% suggests they have not shown the sustained surge required to close gaps in the standings. Even with modestly better home (44.6%) and away (44.4%) splits, the Devils have played like a sub-.500 team overall.
The Devils sit 15th in the conference, already 11 points behind the Islanders at the current cutline of 69 points and projected to finish at 96.7. Teams directly ahead such as Washington (65 points), Columbus (65), and Ottawa (63) all project well above New Jersey’s 84.9-point finish, while stronger contenders like Boston, Pittsburgh, and Buffalo are tracking near or above 100 points. With so many teams to pass and several of them posting significantly higher strength ratings, gaining ground is highly unrealistic at this stage.
New Jersey has 25 games left with a favorable 14 at home and an average overall schedule difficulty, facing opponents with a 52.2% strength rating. That said, the model expects just 26.9 additional points from those games, which would leave them more than 10 points short of the projected playoff cutoff. Even outperforming expectations by several wins would still require multiple teams above them to collapse simultaneously.
While the Devils are not mathematically eliminated, their playoff path is extremely narrow and depends on a dramatic and sustained turnaround that has not appeared all season. Realistically, the final stretch is more about player development, evaluating the roster, and building momentum for next year rather than chasing a postseason berth.
Your team's playoff hopes are fading — here are some teams worth cheering for:
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 16 | 11 | 121 | +99 | 69.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you miss watching elite, game-breaking talent every night, Colorado delivers with Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar driving one of the most explosive teams in the league. They play fast, aggressive, skill-heavy hockey that’s easy to fall in love with. As a Western Conference powerhouse, you can jump on without dealing with Metro baggage.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 20 | 12 | 112 | +53 | 65.7% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Dallas is a balanced contender with depth down the middle, strong goaltending, and a blue line that can both defend and push play. They’re built the way Devils fans appreciate — structured but still dangerous offensively. It’s a steady, professional group that looks built for a long run out West.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 23 | 9 | 109 | +47 | 62.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you want to stick in the East without cheering a rival, Buffalo is a fun, offense-first team that feels a bit like a Devils cousin. They’ve leaned into young skill and play with pace, and their fan base is starving for a breakthrough. There’s something relatable about riding with a talented group trying to take the next step.
| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 33 | 6 | 92 | -15 | 46.5% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Anaheim is your underdog-with-upside option. They’re not the flashiest contender, but they’ve scratched and clawed their way into the picture and play a scrappy, resilient style. It’s low-pressure bandwagoning — if they make noise, you look like a genius for hopping on early.
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Projected to finish with 87–87 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 98–98 points. Finishes above the cutline in 0.0% of simulations.
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 106 | 82 | 0 | 60.9% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 106.0 | 100.0% | |
| 5 | 100 | 82 | 0 | 57.4% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 100.0 | 100.0% | |
| 6 | 99 | 82 | 0 | 59.2% | 65.0% | 50.0% | 99.0 | 100.0% | |
| 7 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 55.2% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 8 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 57.6% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 9 | 95 | 82 | 0 | 60.2% | 80.0% | 50.0% | 95.0 | 0.0% | |
| 10 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.1% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 11 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 12 | 91 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 91.0 | 0.0% | |
| 13 | 87 | 82 | 0 | 49.4% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 87.0 | 0.0% | |
| 14 | 84 | 82 | 0 | 49.0% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 84.0 | 0.0% | |
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.4% | 51.1% | 48.8% | 45.1% | 55.0% |
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Jack Hughes | C | 61 | 27 | 50 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 33 | 21:18 | |
| 63 | Jesper Bratt | L | 82 | 22 | 49 | 71 | -11 | 0 | 74 | 24 | 18:45 | |
| 13 | Nico Hischier | C | 82 | 28 | 37 | 65 | -6 | 0 | 58 | 63 | 20:42 | |
| 28 | Timo Meier | R | 77 | 24 | 20 | 44 | -16 | 0 | 131 | 52 | 18:30 | |
| 16 | Connor Brown | R | 75 | 18 | 25 | 43 | -1 | 0 | 25 | 37 | 17:33 | |
| 91 | Dawson Mercer | C | 82 | 20 | 22 | 42 | -2 | 0 | 33 | 47 | 18:13 | |
| 7 | Dougie Hamilton | D | 77 | 12 | 26 | 38 | -2 | 0 | 87 | 78 | 21:32 | |
| 43 | Luke Hughes | D | 68 | 6 | 29 | 35 | -4 | 0 | 19 | 54 | 23:00 | |
| 81 | Arseny Gritsyuk | R | 66 | 13 | 18 | 31 | -3 | 0 | 58 | 18 | 15:10 | |
| 12 | Cody Glass | C | 70 | 19 | 7 | 26 | +3 | 0 | 42 | 40 | 13:36 | |
| 17 | Simon Nemec | D | 68 | 11 | 15 | 26 | -11 | 0 | 23 | 104 | 19:40 | |
| 71 | Jonas Siegenthaler | D | 82 | 0 | 16 | 16 | -9 | 0 | 92 | 138 | 19:28 | |
| 47 | Paul Cotter | L | 79 | 9 | 6 | 15 | -24 | 0 | 192 | 22 | 10:39 | |
| 5 | Brenden Dillon | D | 82 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -13 | 0 | 202 | 103 | 17:59 | |
| 81 | Ondrej Palat | L | 51 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -5 | 0 | 89 | 41 | 12:44 | |
| 29 | Lenni Hameenaho | R | 33 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -3 | 0 | 20 | 16 | 12:11 | |
| 8 | Johnathan Kovacevic | D | 34 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 38 | 17:50 | |
| 11 | Stefan Noesen | R | 38 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -12 | 0 | 33 | 15 | 11:45 | |
| 22 | Brett Pesce | D | 37 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -11 | 0 | 11 | 80 | 20:18 | |
| 41 | Luke Glendening → PHI | C | 52 | 0 | 4 | 4 | -11 | 0 | 66 | 45 | 9:54 | |
| 45 | Colton White | D | 23 | 0 | 4 | 4 | +2 | 0 | 23 | 16 | 12:15 | |
| 42 | Maxim Tsyplakov | R | 22 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -8 | 0 | 37 | 4 | 8:28 | |
| 44 | Dennis Cholowski | D | 17 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -6 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 14:40 | |
| 83 | Juho Lammikko | C | 24 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -4 | 0 | 40 | 14 | 9:52 | |
| 72 | Nick Bjugstad | C | 26 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -4 | 0 | 35 | 10 | 9:57 | |
| 33 | Evgenii Dadonov | L | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 | 7 | 12 | 10:39 | |
| 48 | Brian Halonen | L | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 7:46 | |
| 38 | Topias Vilen | D | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14:59 | |
| 21 | Marc McLaughlin | C | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8:11 | |
| 15 | Zack MacEwen | R | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 6:20 |
| Date | Opponent | Location | Score | Result | Opp Strength | Playoff Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14 | Boston Bruins | Away | 4 - 0 | L | 57.4% | 0.0% |
| Apr 12 | Ottawa Senators | Home | 4 - 3 (OT) | W | 59.2% | 0.0% |
| Apr 11 | Detroit Red Wings | Away | 3 - 5 | W | 46.1% | 0.0% |
| Apr 09 | Pittsburgh Penguins | Home | 2 - 5 | L | 55.2% | 0.0% |
| Apr 07 | Philadelphia Flyers | Home | 1 - 5 | L | 57.6% | -0.2% |
| Apr 05 | Montréal Canadiens | Away | 0 - 3 | W | 60.9% | +0.2% |
| Apr 04 | Montréal Canadiens | Home | 3 - 4 (OT) | OTL | 60.9% | -0.2% |
| Apr 02 | Washington Capitals | Home | 7 - 3 | W | 60.2% | 0.0% |
| Mar 31 | New York Rangers | Away | 4 - 1 | L | 49.9% | -0.2% |
| Mar 29 | Chicago Blackhawks | Home | 5 - 3 | W | 36.9% | +0.1% |