Toronto Maple Leafs ELIMINATED
Atlantic Division, Eastern Conference
Current Standings
| GP | W | L | OTL | PTS | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS % | Last 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 32 | 36 | 14 | 78 | 253 | 299 | -46 | 47.6% |
|
Playoff Probabilities
Based on 100,000 simulations run on Apr 17, 2026
Analysis
Summary
The Toronto Maple Leafs are on the brink, with just a 2.0% playoff probability and a projected finish well short of the cut line. At 63 points through 59 games, they would need a near-perfect final stretch to close a sizable gap in a crowded Eastern Conference race.
Record and Recent Performance
Toronto sits at 27-23-9 (63 points) with a 53.4% points percentage and a -12 goal differential (191 goals for, 203 against), indicators of a team hovering below true contender status. Their underlying team strength rating of 46.5% reinforces that profile, and the split is stark: respectable at home (51.7%) but struggling badly on the road (39.0%). Recent form is particularly troubling at 35.0%, suggesting they’re trending in the wrong direction at the worst possible time. Taken together, this is a middling team by results and metrics, not one that’s been building momentum toward a playoff push.
The Competition
The Eastern Conference wild-card race is both crowded and unforgiving. The Islanders currently hold the final spot at 71 points with a projected 96.7-point finish, while Detroit (74), Montreal (73), Pittsburgh (72), and Boston (71) are all tracking toward 97–101 points with playoff odds north of 65%. Even teams below the cut line like Columbus (projected 94.9) and Washington (92.3) are ahead of Toronto’s projected 87.1. To realistically qualify, the Leafs would need to make up at least eight to ten points on multiple teams over just 23 games, effectively leaping five clubs. That’s not impossible, but with several of those teams carrying strength ratings between 55% and 64%, it would require a dramatic and sustained reversal of form.
Remaining Schedule
Toronto has 23 games left, 10 at home and 13 on the road, and that road-heavy split is problematic given their 39.0% away strength. The average opponent strength of 54.1% is slightly above league average (53.2%), making this no soft landing. Models project 24.1 additional points, which would bring them to about 87 points — nearly 10 shy of the 96.7-point projected cutoff. To hit even 97 points, the Leafs would need roughly 34 points in their final 23 games, equivalent to something like a 16-5-2 run, a pace far beyond anything they’ve shown this season.
Outlook
At 2.0% playoff odds, the Leafs are effectively in must-win territory every night from here on out. The math, their negative goal differential, weak road play, and the strength of the teams ahead all point to long odds. While not mathematically eliminated, Toronto would need a dramatic surge and help from several competitors to keep their season alive into late April.
Bandwagon Options
Your team's playoff hopes are fading — here are some teams worth cheering for:
Colorado Avalanche
Central · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 16 | 11 | 121 | +99 | 69.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you’re used to watching elite skill up front in Toronto, Colorado will feel familiar. Nathan MacKinnon drives play every night, Cale Makar is a one-man breakout machine, and the Avs play fast, attacking hockey that rarely gets boring. They’re a powerhouse out West, so you can enjoy the ride without conference guilt.
Dallas Stars
Central · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 20 | 12 | 112 | +53 | 65.7% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Dallas offers a deep, balanced contender that rolls four lines and defends well — a nice change of pace if you’re tired of top-heavy narratives. With elite goaltending and a mix of savvy vets and young scorers like Jason Robertson, they look built for a long run. It’s easy to jump on a team that feels complete and composed.
Edmonton Oilers
Pacific · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 30 | 11 | 93 | +13 | 57.2% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
If you still believe in the “superstars can carry you” model, Edmonton is the bandwagon. Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl bring the same nightly must-watch energy Leafs fans are used to, and every game feels like it could turn into a track meet. They’re flawed enough to be relatable, but dangerous enough to make real noise.
Seattle Kraken
Pacific · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | 37 | 11 | 79 | -37 | 41.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Seattle is a fun underdog pick with relentless pace and a chip-on-the-shoulder identity. They don’t rely on one marquee name — it’s waves of pressure and depth scoring, which makes them easy to root for in a series. Plus, backing a newer franchise keeps things fresh and low-drama.
Utah Mammoth
Central · Western| W | L | OTL | PTS | Diff | Str | Playoff | Cup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 33 | 6 | 92 | +28 | 56.6% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Utah is the feel-good story: a team carving out its identity and surprising people with structured, confident hockey. They’ve got a strong defensive backbone and timely scoring, the kind of formula that travels well in the playoffs. If you want a rising group that still feels a little ahead of schedule, this is your pick.
Required Win Percentage for Playoffs
Win percentage needed in remaining games to achieve each playoff probability threshold. A checkmark (✓) means the team has mathematically clinched a playoff spot. A dash (—) means the threshold is impossible to reach.
Points Distribution vs. Cutline
Projected to finish with 78–78 points (middle 50%). The playoff cutline is typically 98–98 points. Finishes above the cutline in 0.0% of simulations.
Team Projection
Playoff Cutline
Playoff Race — Eastern Conference
| # | Team | PTS | GP | Left | STR | L10 | SOS | Proj PTS | Playoff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 106 | 82 | 0 | 60.9% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 106.0 | 100.0% | |
| 5 | 100 | 82 | 0 | 57.4% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 100.0 | 100.0% | |
| 6 | 99 | 82 | 0 | 59.2% | 65.0% | 50.0% | 99.0 | 100.0% | |
| 7 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 55.2% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 8 | 98 | 82 | 0 | 57.6% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 98.0 | 100.0% | |
| 9 | 95 | 82 | 0 | 60.2% | 80.0% | 50.0% | 95.0 | 0.0% | |
| 10 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.1% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 11 | 92 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 92.0 | 0.0% | |
| 12 | 91 | 82 | 0 | 46.8% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 91.0 | 0.0% | |
| 13 | 87 | 82 | 0 | 49.4% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 87.0 | 0.0% | |
| 14 | 84 | 82 | 0 | 49.0% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 84.0 | 0.0% | |
| 15 | 78 | 82 | 0 | 40.1% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 78.0 | 0.0% | |
| 16 | 77 | 82 | 0 | 49.9% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 77.0 | 0.0% | |
Team Strength Metrics
| Overall Strength | Home Strength | Away Strength | Pythagorean Win % | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.1% | 44.2% | 35.2% | 41.7% | 25.0% |
Player Statistics
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | SOG | HIT | BLK | TOI | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88 | William Nylander | R | 64 | 29 | 45 | 74 | -13 | 0 | 12 | 26 | 19:21 | |
| 91 | John Tavares | C | 81 | 30 | 39 | 69 | -29 | 0 | 73 | 24 | 18:09 | |
| 23 | Matthew Knies | L | 78 | 22 | 40 | 62 | -30 | 0 | 149 | 31 | 18:47 | |
| 34 | Auston Matthews | C | 60 | 27 | 26 | 53 | -4 | 0 | 42 | 81 | 20:48 | |
| 63 | Matias Maccelli | L | 70 | 14 | 25 | 39 | -21 | 0 | 23 | 17 | 14:36 | |
| 95 | Oliver Ekman-Larsson | D | 77 | 8 | 31 | 39 | -6 | 0 | 84 | 70 | 20:34 | |
| 44 | Morgan Rielly | D | 77 | 11 | 25 | 36 | -18 | 0 | 35 | 112 | 21:10 | |
| 11 | Max Domi | C | 79 | 11 | 24 | 35 | -29 | 0 | 37 | 35 | 14:53 | |
| 74 | Bobby McMann ← SEA → SEA | C | 60 | 19 | 13 | 32 | -3 | 0 | 135 | 23 | 15:19 | |
| 89 | Nicholas Robertson | L | 77 | 15 | 16 | 31 | -13 | 0 | 75 | 36 | 12:38 | |
| 53 | Easton Cowan | R | 65 | 11 | 18 | 29 | -6 | 0 | 72 | 32 | 14:37 | |
| 22 | Jake McCabe | D | 79 | 5 | 19 | 24 | +5 | 0 | 103 | 189 | 22:25 | |
| 10 | Nicolas Roy → COL | C | 59 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 33 | 14:45 | |
| 81 | Dakota Joshua | C | 55 | 10 | 8 | 18 | -2 | 0 | 194 | 32 | 12:14 | |
| 18 | Steven Lorentz | C | 70 | 7 | 10 | 17 | -2 | 0 | 146 | 48 | 11:49 | |
| 28 | Troy Stecher ← EDM | D | 57 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -8 | 0 | 28 | 76 | 19:45 | |
| 21 | Scott Laughton → LAK | C | 43 | 8 | 4 | 12 | -3 | 0 | 78 | 28 | 13:38 | |
| 19 | Calle Jarnkrok | C | 55 | 6 | 2 | 8 | -14 | 0 | 33 | 10 | 11:52 | |
| 25 | Brandon Carlo | D | 55 | 0 | 7 | 7 | +4 | 0 | 65 | 97 | 19:21 | |
| 29 | Bo Groulx | C | 13 | 3 | 2 | 5 | +4 | 0 | 34 | 6 | 15:41 | |
| 2 | Simon Benoit | D | 72 | 0 | 5 | 5 | -21 | 0 | 192 | 112 | 17:15 | |
| 27 | Sammy Blais → MTL | L | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 28 | 5 | 8:17 | |
| 51 | Philippe Myers | D | 39 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -10 | 0 | 55 | 51 | 14:32 | |
| 8 | Chris Tanev | D | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +8 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 17:58 | |
| 26 | Jacob Quillan | C | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -5 | 0 | 40 | 13 | 10:09 | |
| 36 | Dakota Mermis | D | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 13:01 | |
| 43 | Luke Haymes | C | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 14:03 | |
| 33 | Matt Benning | D | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12:26 | |
| 76 | William Villeneuve | D | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17:42 | |
| 61 | Michael Pezzetta | L | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 30 | 3 | 6:25 | |
| 77 | Ryan Tverberg | C | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10:40 | |
| 83 | Marshall Rifai | D | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9:40 |
Recent Games (Last 10)
| Date | Opponent | Location | Score | Result | Opp Strength | Playoff Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15 | Ottawa Senators | Away | 3 - 1 | L | 59.2% | 0.0% |
| Apr 13 | Dallas Stars | Home | 5 - 6 | L | 65.7% | 0.0% |
| Apr 11 | Florida Panthers | Home | 2 - 6 | L | 49.0% | 0.0% |
| Apr 09 | New York Islanders | Away | 5 - 3 | L | 46.8% | 0.0% |
| Apr 08 | Washington Capitals | Home | 0 - 4 | L | 60.2% | 0.0% |
| Apr 04 | Los Angeles Kings | Away | 7 - 6 (OT) | OTL | 53.1% | 0.0% |
| Apr 02 | San Jose Sharks | Away | 4 - 1 | L | 48.0% | 0.0% |
| Mar 30 | Anaheim Ducks | Away | 4 - 5 (OT) | W | 46.5% | 0.0% |
| Mar 28 | St. Louis Blues | Away | 5 - 1 | L | 51.0% | 0.0% |
| Mar 25 | New York Rangers | Home | 4 - 3 | W | 49.9% | 0.0% |